Writing with AI
AI as Your Writing Coach for Family History
AI can coach the family history you have already written, without writing a word of it for you. What a coaching pass returns and why it works.
Research with AI
MyHeritage and Ancestry both barred AI agents from their sites in 2026. What the terms actually say, and what AI is genuinely useful for at the search box.
Writing with AI
A finished family history is one a reader has read. Not a complete tree, not exhausted sources — a chronicle someone who is not you has actually read.
Research with AI
AIM is the Chronicle Makers method for working with AI on family history research: Assess, Interact, Measure. It replaces "trust but verify."
Chronicles are a new type of family history writing. The best way to understand them is the contrast between genealogy reports and typical family history.
Claude for genealogy: how to use Anthropic's AI for reading old records, building proof arguments, and writing family history stories.
An estimated 98% of genealogists who want to write never finish. The problem is not discipline or time. It is three specific patterns you can fix.
How to use AI to organize genealogy research: build timelines, create inventories, find gaps, and get your files ready to write from.
Is AI safe for genealogy? Yes, with guardrails. Here are the three risks, how to catch each one, and the verification habit that protects your research.
You have enough to write. The Full Pantry Problem is the gap between having enough and believing it, and it hits the best-researched family historians hardest.
ChatGPT and Claude's new live voice mode lets you talk instead of type to write your ancestor's story faster.
Your making process is the path from the records you found to the chronicle your family reads. Documenting it as you work is the practice.
The Soundness Standard defines when research on one ancestor is finished: searched to the records that exist, written down, honestly defensible.
The privacy question in family history is not really about AI. It is about whose material goes into your tool, and what it does to the tool.
Is it cheating to use AI to write your family history? No. Cheating needs a competition with rules and you never entered one. Here's the real answer.
The chronicle of Clyde B. Keele, a Burnet County, Texas rancher whose character a new son-in-law learned across five years of Saturday lunches — told through two unforgettable afternoons. By Mark Gillin.
AI can't hand you the answer about your ancestor, and that was never the point. How the Full Pantry changes what AI does for genealogy.
The Research Quality Check is the five-check standard family historians run on their research before writing an ancestor's story.
Claude's Fable model is remarkable, and family historians don't need it. Here's what actually gets your daily genealogy work done.
The chronicle of Francis Day, a Patriot who fought in the Battle of Guilford Courthouse, North Carolina. Written by his descendant John Day.
Summary of the newest features in Gemini AI for family historians, highlighting the most useful features and what to avoid.